(no subject)
Oct. 7th, 2007 05:29 pmToday I got my mysterious hardware item fully polished and ready to be sent out for casting. Yay, me! It's looking pretty damn good, too, if I do say so myself- and I did some Google searches, and it looks at the moment like I don't have much serious competition for my concept. :)
Also, my studio is delightfully scented with beeswax and honey, due to our beekeeping efforts (detailed in our Beemused blog). This makes a nice change from the swamp-gas aroma of liver-of-sulfur, for instance.
I also did some pricing work on the argentium Confetti Ring I recently finished. Ouch. I spend a lot more time on these things than I'd recognized. This is one way my pricing software is a help; it makes it harder for me to ignore aspects of a piece, be they labor or materials.
Also: while I am not proud to admit this, I often find pictures of other people's work encouraging. This morning, for instance, I saw a really lovely piece with 22k granulation on it- and when i examined it more closely, I saw that in one area the granules had been really fried. I mean- fried to the point where I may well have junked the piece! and yet the artist was proud enough of it despite that to feature it, and in initial viewing the fried part was not all that obvious. I often feel similarly when I see flawed stone-setting featured in pictures. The thing is- I'm a very harsh critic of my own work, and feel like I've failed when I mess up. And yet- many successful, famous artisans aren't all that much better than I am, and apparently feel no qualms about featuring work that I'd feel ashamed of! So! I do find it encouraging, since it seems that my own skills are pretty solid; plus, I begin to recognize that my own critiques- while valid- are harsher than they need to be, and people do not necessarily require pure perfection as a matter of course. A piece can be gorgeous without being perfect. Something for me to think on (though I do want to make perfect stuff!).
Also, my studio is delightfully scented with beeswax and honey, due to our beekeeping efforts (detailed in our Beemused blog). This makes a nice change from the swamp-gas aroma of liver-of-sulfur, for instance.
I also did some pricing work on the argentium Confetti Ring I recently finished. Ouch. I spend a lot more time on these things than I'd recognized. This is one way my pricing software is a help; it makes it harder for me to ignore aspects of a piece, be they labor or materials.
Also: while I am not proud to admit this, I often find pictures of other people's work encouraging. This morning, for instance, I saw a really lovely piece with 22k granulation on it- and when i examined it more closely, I saw that in one area the granules had been really fried. I mean- fried to the point where I may well have junked the piece! and yet the artist was proud enough of it despite that to feature it, and in initial viewing the fried part was not all that obvious. I often feel similarly when I see flawed stone-setting featured in pictures. The thing is- I'm a very harsh critic of my own work, and feel like I've failed when I mess up. And yet- many successful, famous artisans aren't all that much better than I am, and apparently feel no qualms about featuring work that I'd feel ashamed of! So! I do find it encouraging, since it seems that my own skills are pretty solid; plus, I begin to recognize that my own critiques- while valid- are harsher than they need to be, and people do not necessarily require pure perfection as a matter of course. A piece can be gorgeous without being perfect. Something for me to think on (though I do want to make perfect stuff!).
no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 04:53 am (UTC)*Large sums of money=anything over $30 at the moment for me, but that's because I'm still insanely broke.
By the way, what software program do you use?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-08 08:06 pm (UTC)I'm using Jewelry Design Manager, and it's OK. There are awkwardnesses with it for which I've made work-arounds. It's mainly intended for people who do bead work, and generally would be ideal for someone who does that and who makes multiples of pieces. For figuring out relative prices, she uses a formula based on the cost of materials (you can change the multiplier on that, but not the way it's calculated), so it would be lovely for work where the materials were a pretty huge part of the cost, and labor less; since my work is generally the opposite, it doesn't work for getting a true retail price for me- though I can set my own. It does come out pretty accurate when I work in gold, though; it's just that silver is so inexpensive compared to the labor! The inventorying end is awkward to navigate, and not a really good fit for stuff like shapes cut out of sheet, inventorying sheet, etc. Plus- it's a pain to scroll through all the entries when one is assembling bits for a piece- and that's even though a number of my entries are like "Silver: use weight" and "Misc stones: use price".
I don't know if there are better programs. And this one does make me keep track of my costs on each piece, and does help me figure out a fair price so I don't end up paying myself nothing, or potentially selling to galleries at a loss or something. So it's worth it, but it's not heaven-sent. IMHO, and YMMV!